| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230621081425.420607-1-pan.deng@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:14:25 +0800
From: Deng Pan <pan.deng@...el.com>
To: tim.c.chen@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianyou.li@...el.com, yu.ma@...el.com, lipeng.zhu@...el.com,
yu.c.chen@...el.com, Deng Pan <pan.deng@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/task_group: Re-layout structure to reduce false sharing
When running UnixBench/Pipe-based Context Switching case, we observed
high false sharing for accessing ‘load_avg’ against rt_se and rt_rq
when config CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is turned on.
Pipe-based Context Switching case is a typical sleep/wakeup scenario,
in which load_avg is frequenly loaded and stored, at the meantime, rt_se
and rt_rq are frequently loaded. Unfortunately, they are in the same
cacheline.
This change re-layouts the structure:
1. Move rt_se and rt_rq to a 2nd cacheline.
2. Keep ‘parent’ field in the 2nd cacheline since it's also accessed
very often when cgroups are nested, thanks Tim Chen for providing the
insight.
Tested on Intel Icelake 2 sockets 80C/160T platform, based on v6.4-rc5.
With this change, Pipe-based Context Switching 160 parallel score is
improved ~9.6%, perf record tool reports rt_se and rt_rq access cycles
are reduced from ~14.5% to ~0.3%, perf c2c tool shows the false-sharing
is resolved as expected:
Baseline:
=================================================
Shared Cache Line Distribution Pareto
=================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 1031 3927 3322 50 0 0xff284d17b5c0fa00
----------------------------------------------------------------------
63.72% 65.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa134934e 4247 3249 4057 13874 160 [k] update_cfs_group [kernel.kallsyms] update_cfs_group+78 0 1
7.47% 3.23% 98.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa13478ac 12034 13166 7699 8149 160 [k] update_load_avg [kernel.kallsyms] update_load_avg+940 0 1
0.58% 0.18% 0.39% 98.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa13478b4 40713 44343 33768 158 95 [k] update_load_avg [kernel.kallsyms] update_load_avg+948 0 1
0.00% 0.08% 1.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa1348076 0 14303 6006 75 61 [k] __update_blocked_fair [kernel.kallsyms] __update_blocked_fair+998 0 1
0.19% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa1349355 30718 2820 23693 246 117 [k] update_cfs_group [kernel.kallsyms] update_cfs_group+85 0 1
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffffa134807e 0 0 24401 2 2 [k] __update_blocked_fair [kernel.kallsyms] __update_blocked_fair+1006 0 1
14.16% 16.30% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffffa133c5c7 5101 4028 4839 7354 160 [k] set_task_cpu [kernel.kallsyms] set_task_cpu+279 0 1
0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffffa133c5ce 0 18646 25195 30 28 [k] set_task_cpu [kernel.kallsyms] set_task_cpu+286 0 1
13.87% 14.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x10 1 1 0xffffffffa133c5b5 4138 3738 5608 6321 160 [k] set_task_cpu [kernel.kallsyms] set_task_cpu+261 0 1
0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x10 1 1 0xffffffffa133c5bc 0 6321 26398 149 88 [k] set_task_cpu [kernel.kallsyms] set_task_cpu+268 0 1
With this change:
=================================================
Shared Cache Line Distribution Pareto
=================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 1118 3340 3118 57 0 0xff1d6ca01ecc5e80
----------------------------------------------------------------------
91.59% 94.46% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff8914934e 4710 4211 5158 14218 160 [k] update_cfs_group [kernel.kallsyms] update_cfs_group+78 0 1
7.42% 4.82% 97.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff891478ac 15225 14713 8593 7858 160 [k] update_load_avg [kernel.kallsyms] update_load_avg+940 0 1
0.81% 0.66% 0.58% 98.25% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff891478b4 38486 44799 33123 186 107 [k] update_load_avg [kernel.kallsyms] update_load_avg+948 0 1
0.18% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff89149355 20077 32046 22302 388 144 [k] update_cfs_group [kernel.kallsyms] update_cfs_group+85 0 1
0.00% 0.00% 1.41% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff89148076 0 0 6804 85 64 [k] __update_blocked_fair [kernel.kallsyms] __update_blocked_fair+998 0 1
0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 1.75% 0.00% 0x0 1 1 0xffffffff8914807e 0 0 26581 3 3 [k] __update_blocked_fair [kernel.kallsyms] __update_blocked_fair+1006 0 1
Besides above, Hackbench, netperf and schbench were also tested, no
obvious regression detected.
hackbench
=========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
process-pipe 1-groups 1.00 ( 0.87) -0.95 ( 1.72)
process-pipe 2-groups 1.00 ( 0.57) +9.11 ( 14.44)
process-pipe 4-groups 1.00 ( 0.64) +6.77 ( 2.50)
process-pipe 8-groups 1.00 ( 0.28) -4.39 ( 2.02)
process-sockets 1-groups 1.00 ( 2.37) +1.13 ( 0.76)
process-sockets 2-groups 1.00 ( 7.83) -3.41 ( 4.78)
process-sockets 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.24) +0.71 ( 2.13)
process-sockets 8-groups 1.00 ( 0.39) +1.05 ( 0.19)
threads-pipe 1-groups 1.00 ( 1.85) -2.22 ( 0.66)
threads-pipe 2-groups 1.00 ( 2.36) +3.48 ( 6.44)
threads-pipe 4-groups 1.00 ( 3.07) -7.92 ( 5.82)
threads-pipe 8-groups 1.00 ( 1.00) +2.68 ( 1.28)
threads-sockets 1-groups 1.00 ( 0.34) +1.19 ( 1.96)
threads-sockets 2-groups 1.00 ( 6.24) -4.88 ( 2.10)
threads-sockets 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.26) +0.41 ( 1.58)
threads-sockets 8-groups 1.00 ( 0.46) +0.07 ( 2.19)
netperf
=======
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
TCP_RR 40-threads 1.00 ( 0.78) -0.18 ( 1.80)
TCP_RR 80-threads 1.00 ( 0.72) -1.62 ( 0.84)
TCP_RR 120-threads 1.00 ( 0.74) -0.35 ( 0.99)
TCP_RR 160-threads 1.00 ( 30.79) -1.75 ( 29.57)
TCP_RR 200-threads 1.00 ( 17.45) -2.89 ( 16.64)
TCP_RR 240-threads 1.00 ( 27.73) -2.46 ( 19.35)
TCP_RR 280-threads 1.00 ( 32.76) -3.00 ( 30.65)
TCP_RR 320-threads 1.00 ( 41.73) -3.14 ( 37.84)
UDP_RR 40-threads 1.00 ( 1.21) +0.02 ( 1.68)
UDP_RR 80-threads 1.00 ( 0.33) -0.47 ( 9.59)
UDP_RR 120-threads 1.00 ( 12.38) +0.30 ( 13.42)
UDP_RR 160-threads 1.00 ( 29.10) +8.17 ( 34.51)
UDP_RR 200-threads 1.00 ( 21.04) -1.72 ( 20.96)
UDP_RR 240-threads 1.00 ( 38.11) -2.54 ( 38.15)
UDP_RR 280-threads 1.00 ( 31.56) -0.73 ( 32.70)
UDP_RR 320-threads 1.00 ( 41.54) -2.00 ( 44.39)
schbench
========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
normal 1-mthreads 1.00 ( 4.16) +3.53 ( 0.86)
normal 2-mthreads 1.00 ( 2.86) +1.69 ( 2.91)
normal 4-mthreads 1.00 ( 4.97) -6.53 ( 8.20)
normal 8-mthreads 1.00 ( 0.86) -0.70 ( 0.54)
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Deng Pan <pan.deng@...el.com>
---
V1 -> V2:
- Add comment in data structure
- More data support in commit log
kernel/sched/sched.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ec7b3e0a2b20..4fbd4b3a4bdd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -389,6 +389,19 @@ struct task_group {
#endif
#endif
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct list_head list;
+
+ struct list_head siblings;
+ struct list_head children;
+
+ /*
+ * To reduce false sharing, current layout is optimized to make
+ * sure load_avg is in a different cacheline from parent, rt_se
+ * and rt_rq.
+ */
+ struct task_group *parent;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
struct sched_rt_entity **rt_se;
struct rt_rq **rt_rq;
@@ -396,13 +409,6 @@ struct task_group {
struct rt_bandwidth rt_bandwidth;
#endif
- struct rcu_head rcu;
- struct list_head list;
-
- struct task_group *parent;
- struct list_head siblings;
- struct list_head children;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP
struct autogroup *autogroup;
#endif
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists