linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix returning possible non-optimal candidate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCVVnhb7S=iC3vmfJbPj9Ug+W33pw6VuFO6De0FcTuNQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:30:14 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix returning possible non-optimal candidate

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:16, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> In best_fits < 0 case, best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap is checked to
> determine whether best_energy_cpu should be returned. But prev_fits can
> be > 0 in this case and it should be preferred.

IIRC, (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap) makes the condition
(prev_fits < 0) useless

Do you have a use case where
(best_fits < 0)
&& (prev_fits > 0)
&& (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap)
?

>
> Fixes: e5ed0550c04c ("sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 28ff831ee847..a4e300fc44be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7684,7 +7684,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>
>         if ((best_fits > prev_fits) ||
>             ((best_fits > 0) && (best_delta < prev_delta)) ||
> -           ((best_fits < 0) && (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap)))
> +           ((best_fits < 0) && (prev_fits < 0) && (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap)))
>                 target = best_energy_cpu;
>
>         return target;
> --
> 2.27.0
>