linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] mm: Change do_vmi_align

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:10:36 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] mm: Change do_vmi_align_munmap() side tree index

On (23/06/20 09:04), Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > On (23/06/12 16:39), Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > [..]
> > > @@ -2450,17 +2452,17 @@ do_vmi_align_munmap(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE)
> > >  	/* Make sure no VMAs are about to be lost. */
> > >  	{
> > > -		MA_STATE(test, &mt_detach, start, end - 1);
> > > +		MA_STATE(test, &mt_detach, 0, 0);
> > >  		struct vm_area_struct *vma_mas, *vma_test;
> > >  		int test_count = 0;
> > >  
> > >  		vma_iter_set(vmi, start);
> > >  		rcu_read_lock();
> > > -		vma_test = mas_find(&test, end - 1);
> > > +		vma_test = mas_find(&test, count - 1);
> > >  		for_each_vma_range(*vmi, vma_mas, end) {
> > >  			BUG_ON(vma_mas != vma_test);
> > >  			test_count++;
> > > -			vma_test = mas_next(&test, end - 1);
> > > +			vma_test = mas_next(&test, count - 1);
> > >  		}
> > >  		rcu_read_unlock();
> > >  		BUG_ON(count != test_count);
> > 
> > Something isn't quite working, I'm hitting BUG_ON(vma_mas != vma_test)
> 
> Is this with next by any chance?

Oh yes, linux-next