linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] mm/min_free_kbytes: modify min_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230621092048.5242-1-liuq131@chinatelecom.cn>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:20:48 +0800
From:   liuq <liuq131@...natelecom.cn>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     ying.huang@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liuq <liuq131@...natelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm/min_free_kbytes: modify min_free_kbytes calculation rules

The current calculation of min_free_kbytes only uses ZONE_DMA and
ZONE_NORMAL pages,but the ZONE_MOVABLE zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN]
will also divide part of min_free_kbytes.This will cause the min
watermark of ZONE_NORMAL to be too small in the presence of ZONE_MOVEABLE.

__GFP_HIGH and PF_MEMALLOC allocations usually don't need movable
zone pages, so just like ZONE_HIGHMEM, cap pages_min to a small
value in __setup_per_zone_wmarks.

On my testing machine with 16GB of memory (transparent hugepage is
turned off by default, and movablecore=12G is configured)
The following is a comparative test data of watermark_min

		no patch	add patch
ZONE_DMA	1		8
ZONE_DMA32	151		709
ZONE_NORMAL	233		1113
ZONE_MOVABLE	1434		128
min_free_kbytes	7288		7326

Signed-off-by: liuq <liuq131@...natelecom.cn>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 47421bedc12b..590ed8725e09 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6362,9 +6362,9 @@ static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	/* Calculate total number of !ZONE_HIGHMEM pages */
+	/* Calculate total number of !ZONE_HIGHMEM and !ZONE_MOVABLE pages */
 	for_each_zone(zone) {
-		if (!is_highmem(zone))
+		if (!is_highmem(zone) && zone_idx(zone) != ZONE_MOVABLE)
 			lowmem_pages += zone_managed_pages(zone);
 	}
 
@@ -6374,15 +6374,15 @@ static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
 		tmp = (u64)pages_min * zone_managed_pages(zone);
 		do_div(tmp, lowmem_pages);
-		if (is_highmem(zone)) {
+		if (is_highmem(zone) || zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE) {
 			/*
 			 * __GFP_HIGH and PF_MEMALLOC allocations usually don't
-			 * need highmem pages, so cap pages_min to a small
-			 * value here.
+			 * need highmem and movable zones pages, so cap pages_min
+			 * to a small  value here.
 			 *
 			 * The WMARK_HIGH-WMARK_LOW and (WMARK_LOW-WMARK_MIN)
 			 * deltas control async page reclaim, and so should
-			 * not be capped for highmem.
+			 * not be capped for highmem and movable zones.
 			 */
 			unsigned long min_pages;
 
-- 
2.27.0