[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230621104603.GA24035@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:46:03 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: "Igor A. Artemiev" <Igor.A.Artemiev@...t.ru>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [lvc-project] [PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: remove unnecessary
NULL check
Igor A. Artemiev <Igor.A.Artemiev@...t.ru> wrote:
> On 6/20/23 19:38, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Igor Artemiev <Igor.A.Artemiev@...t.ru> wrote:
> > > In ebt_do_table() 'private->chainstack' cannot be NULL
> > > and the 'cs' pointer is dereferenced below, so it does not make
> > > sense to compare 'private->chainstack' with NULL.
> > ? Why do you think that?
> >
> The 'cs' pointer is dereferenced below without checking, as it is assumed to
> always be initialized with 'private->chainstack[smp_processor_id()]'.
No, its not. The dereferencing is conditional, as is the allocation
of the chainstack.
No user defined chains, no chain stack.
With this change, "ebtables-legacy -A INPUT" causes kernel panic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists