[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230621122027.k37n23yn62ygi6cq@blmsp>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:20:27 +0200
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
Vivek Yadav <vivek.2311@...sung.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4552 and
tcan4553 variants
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:29:40PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/06/2023 11:30, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > These two new chips do not have state or wake pins.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>
> BTW, why did you ignore the tag?
Thanks for your Acked-by.
I did not add it from v1 because:
- We had a long discussion after you sent your tag
- I changed the binding documentation according to the discussion on v1
as stated in the cover letter:
"- Update the binding documentation to specify tcan4552 and tcan4553 with
the tcan4x5x as fallback"
Thanks,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists