[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30d80802-2d9d-2816-1a02-240145f6dd3a@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:31:40 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Sui Jingfeng <18949883232@....com>,
Russell King <linux+etnaviv@...linux.org.uk>,
Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/11] drm/etnaviv: Add dedicated functions to create
and destroy platform device
On 2023/6/21 18:23, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> While back to the question you ask, I want etnaviv_create_platform_device() to be generic,
>>
>> can be used by multiple place for multiple purpose.
>>
>> I have successfully copy this to a another drm driver by simply renaming.
>>
>> The body of the function itself does not need to change.
> But it isn't shared,
This can be shared for drm/etnaviv in the future,
currently, we just need an opportunity to use this function.
I want to create a dummy platform device,
let this dummy platform be bound to the single PCI GPU master.
etnaviv_create_platform_device("dummy", &dummy_device);
1) To verify the component code path on PCI case.
2) Possibly for create a device for some other tiny hardware logic
come with the platform
3) Revival component_compare_dev_name() function.
> in this compilation unit this function is specific
> to the etnaviv driver and I don't see why we shouldn't have etnaviv
> specifics in there if it makes the code of this driver easier to
> follow.
--
Jingfeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists