[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <443f697b-fecf-6e8e-0b76-65257aff7da8@perex.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:08:47 +0200
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kselftest/alsa: pcm-test: Decrease stream duration
from 4 to 2 seconds
On 21. 06. 23 15:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:08:26PM -0400, NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>
>> - const int duration_s = 4, margin_ms = 100;
>> + const int duration_s = 2, margin_ms = 100;
>
> This doesn't scale the margin with the duration which will affect the
> sensitivity of the test to misclocking. It should make it less
> sensitive which is *probably* safer but at least worth noting.
>
> We might also have issues with some of the lower sample rates, IIRC some
> devices are constrained in ways that mean they want a minimum buffer
> size which is harder to satisfy with very short playbacks and low sample
> rates.
>
> I don't know why Jaroslav picked the 4s number here.
You basically replied yourself. The values (time + margin) were picked to do
the DMA test for a reasonable time - based on my experience.
I think that the problem is somewhere else here. The overall test timeout
should be calculated dynamically. All tests may be queried for the maximal
expected interval based on the hardware/software capabilities. It's a bit
pitfall to have a fixed time limit where the realtime tests depend on the
number of devices.
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists