linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/cfi: Fix FineIBT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:14:17 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
        jpoimboe@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, brgerst@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/cfi: Fix FineIBT

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:42:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Alyssa reported a FineIBT issue (patch 6) which led to the discovery of
> a kCFI issue (patch 5) and a bunch of cleanups and enhancements (the
> rest).
> 
> Backports can probably suffice with just the last two.
> 
> Much thanks to Brian for the better ret_from_fork() cleanup.
> 
> Tested using llvm-16 on an Alderlake with both FineIBT and kCFI.

Thanks! This looks really nice. For the series:

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook