[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f03b6c61-1669-c03e-310c-cc1364cf30a8@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:24:15 -0400
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: yazen.ghannam@....com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Disable preemption for CPER decoding
On 6/22/2023 11:35 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> All the above is done when the BERT is processed during late init. This
>> can be scheduled on any CPU, and it may be preemptible.
>
>> 2) mce_setup() will pull info from the executing CPU, so some info in
>> struct mce may be incorrect for the CPU with the error. For example,
>> in a dual-socket system, an error logged in socket 1 CPU but
>> processed by a socket 0 CPU will save the PPIN of the socket 0 CPU.
>
>> Fix the first issue by locally disabling preemption before calling
>> mce_setup().
>
> It doesn't really fix the issue, it just makes the warnings go away.
>
> The BERT record was created because some error crashed the
> system. It's being parsed by a CPU that likely had nothing
> to do with the actual error that occurred in the previous incarnation
> of the OS.
>
Yes, these are true statements.
> If there is a CPER record in the BERT data that includes CPU
> information, that would be the right thing to use. Alternatively
> is there some invalid CPU value that could be loaded into the
> "struct mce"?
>
This is the reason we search for the logical CPU number using the Local
APIC ID provided in the CPER. And fill in relevant data using that CPU
number.
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists