[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1687474039.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:16:24 -0700
From: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>, chen.bo@...el.com,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: guest memory: Misc enhacnement
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Hello. I've updated the patch series following Michael suggestion.
Here are the discussion points.
- 4/6 KVM: x86: Introduce fault type to indicate kvm page fault is private
The moot point is where to put the logic to determine the fault is private.
- The caller site of kvm_mmu_do_page_fault() (or kvm_mmu_page_fault()).
The v1 patch approach.
- npf_interception()
- handle_ept_violation(), handle_ept_misconfig() and TDX counter part.
- Open code in kvm_get_fault_type()
- 5/6 KVM: Add flags to struct kvm_gfn_range
I think this patch doesn't interfere the SNP case because it passes more
info to the callback.
- 6/6 KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback
Let's introduce KVM_X86_TDX_VM for TDX. And revise KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM.
I won't address the name in this patch series.
Thanks,
Hello. This is an RFC patch series based on KVM gmem [1] and [2]
for the common use of TDX and SEV-SNP. I'd like to discuss three items.
* Flags for kvm_gfn_range:
Roth, By adding flags to kvm_gfn_range, kvm_arch_gmem_invalidate() won't be
needed. Maybe x86 gmem_invalidate callback is still needed, though.
* Page fault error code or how to figure out the private page fault
There is an issue to set kvm_page_fault.is_private. I came up with two new
error codes. Is this a way or any other way?
* VM type: Now we have KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM. How do we proceed?
- Keep KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for its use. Introduce KVM_X86_TDX_VM
- Use KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for TDX. (If necessary, introduce another type in
the future)
- any other way?
[1] KVM gmem patches
https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/tree/x86/kvm_gmem_solo
[2] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230612042559.375660-1-michael.roth@amd.com/
Isaku Yamahata (6):
KVM: selftests: Fix test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions()
KVM: selftests: Fix guest_memfd()
KVM: x86/mmu: Pass round full 64-bit error code for the KVM page fault
KVM: x86: Introduce fault type to indicate kvm page fault is private
KVM: Add flags to struct kvm_gfn_range
KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 ++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 31 +++++++++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 7 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 10 ++++-
.../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 4 +-
.../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 16 +++++++-
virt/kvm/guest_mem.c | 9 +++--
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 +-
16 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
base-commit: be8abcec83c87d4e15ae04816b685fe260c4bcfd
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists