[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7l77ucu.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:51:29 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] cpu/SMT: Move SMT prototypes into cpu_smt.h
On Thu, Jun 15 2023 at 17:46, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>
> A subsequent patch would like to use the cpuhp_smt_control enum as part
> of the interface between generic and arch code.
This still has the 'patch' and 'arch' style which I pointed out
before. It seems you fixed it only for one patch in the series.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists