[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230622105326.00006302@Huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:53:26 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
CC: <alison.schofield@...el.com>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <rrichter@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/27] cxl: Updates for CXL Test to work with RCH
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:51:02 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> CXL test needs to be updated to work with latest RCH changes.
> Add CXL test support for devm_cxl_add_rch_dport and
> cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
This chain is getting confusing.
Why a SoB from Robert on this one?
As Terry sent the series I'd expect Terry to be last unless there
was some codevelopment involved in which case that should be indicated
in the tags.
For weird corner cases it's worth adding some comments on why a SoB chain
is non obvious.
I'm far from an expert on cxl-test so I'll leave reviewing this in
depth to others. FWIW looks fine to me.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists