[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230622102736.2831126-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:27:36 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] ocfs2: remove redundant assignment to variable bit_off
Variable bit_off is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
being re-assigned a new value in the following while loop. Remove the
assignment. Cleans up clang scan build warning:
fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c:976:18: warning: Although the value stored to
'bit_off' is used in the enclosing expression, the value is never
actually read from 'bit_off' [deadcode.DeadStores]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c
index c4426d12a2ad..c803c10dd97e 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c
@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static int ocfs2_sync_local_to_main(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
la_start_blk = ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(osb->sb,
le32_to_cpu(la->la_bm_off));
bitmap = la->la_bitmap;
- start = count = bit_off = 0;
+ start = count = 0;
left = le32_to_cpu(alloc->id1.bitmap1.i_total);
while ((bit_off = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, start))
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists