[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad4b4dc9-7466-45a9-a008-c2301a7485dd@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 13:07:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, mkumard@...dia.com, sheetal@...dia.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ASoC: tegra: Fix AMX byte map
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:04:10PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> From: Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
>
> Byte mask for channel-1 of stream-1 is not getting enabled and this
> causes failures during AMX use cases. The enable bit is not set during
> put() callback of byte map mixer control.
>
> This happens because the byte map value 0 matches the initial state
> of byte map array and put() callback returns without doing anything.
>
> Fix the put() callback by actually looking at the byte mask array
> to identify if any change is needed and update the fields accordingly.
I'm not quite sure I follow the logic here - I'd have expected this to
mean that there's a bootstrapping issue and that we should be doing some
more initialisation during startup such that the existing code which
checks if there is a change will be doing the right thing?
> Also update get() callback to return 256 if the byte map is disabled.
This will be a user visible change. It's not clear to me why it's
needed - it seems like it's a hack to push users to do an update in the
case where they want to use channel 1 stream 1?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists