[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27295ba8-f57e-61c1-9cc4-f2207fd97ae0@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:50:19 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] asm-generic: Unify uapi bitsperlong.h for arm64,
riscv and loongarch
On 06/22/2023 04:04 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Tiezhu,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
...
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:5:
>>> include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:13:9: warning: '__BITS_PER_LONG' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
Oh, thanks for the report, I am sorry.
In order to silence the build warning, it should check the definition
of __BITS_PER_LONG first at the beginning of bitsperlong.h, like this:
#ifndef __BITS_PER_LONG
#if defined(__CHAR_BIT__) && defined(__SIZEOF_LONG__)
#define __BITS_PER_LONG (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__)
#else
#define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
#endif
#endif
I will test and then send v3 later.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists