[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJRC2s4sIuJ9V3A0@tpad>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:47:22 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, ppandit@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, mpe@...erman.id.au,
npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
keescook@...omium.org, paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org,
will@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
juerg.haefliger@...onical.com, arnd@...db.de,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, geert+renesas@...der.be,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, rppt@...nel.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to
necessary CPUs
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:43:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:46:16PM +0300, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> > Currently the tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI is sent to all CPUs
> > indiscriminately, this causes unnecessary work and delays notable in
> > real-time use-cases and isolated cpus.
> > By limiting the IPI to only be sent to cpus referencing the effected
> > mm.
> > a config to differentiate architectures that support mm_cpumask from
> > those that don't will allow safe usage of this feature.
> >
> > changes from -v1:
> > - Previous version included a patch to only send the IPI to CPU's with
> > context_tracking in the kernel space, this was removed due to race
> > condition concerns.
> > - for archs that do not maintain mm_cpumask the mask used should be
> > cpu_online_mask (Peter Zijlstra).
> >
>
> Would it not be much better to fix the root cause? As per the last time,
> there's patches that cure the thp abuse of this.
The other case where the IPI can happen is:
CPU-0 CPU-1
tlb_remove_table
tlb_remove_table_sync_one
IPI
local_irq_disable
gup_fast
local_irq_enable
So its not only the THP case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists