linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 16/17] rtc: pcf2127: add UIE support for PCF2131

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230622145800.2442116-17-hugo@hugovil.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:57:59 -0400
From:   Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To:     a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hugo@...ovil.com,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 16/17] rtc: pcf2127: add UIE support for PCF2131

From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>

The PCF2127/29 do NOT support alarms with a 1 second resolution, but
the PCF2131 does.

Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
index 9da3f0096d6b..0ff589789aea 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
@@ -1128,8 +1128,16 @@ static int pcf2127_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
 	pcf2127->rtc->range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_2000;
 	pcf2127->rtc->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2099;
 	pcf2127->rtc->set_start_time = true; /* Sets actual start to 1970 */
-	set_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_2S, pcf2127->rtc->features);
-	clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_UPDATE_INTERRUPT, pcf2127->rtc->features);
+
+	/*
+	 * PCF2127/29 do not work correctly when setting alarms at 1s intervals.
+	 * PCF2131 is ok.
+	 */
+	if (pcf2127->cfg->type == PCF2127 || pcf2127->cfg->type == PCF2129) {
+		set_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_2S, pcf2127->rtc->features);
+		clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_UPDATE_INTERRUPT, pcf2127->rtc->features);
+	}
+
 	clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, pcf2127->rtc->features);
 
 	if (alarm_irq > 0) {
-- 
2.30.2