[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48987df5-480b-2fc5-69b7-0a4ff5f6f842@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:04:52 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
CC: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8998: Don't check halt bit on some
branch clks
On 6/22/2023 5:57 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Some branch clocks are governed externally and we're only supposed to
> send a request concerning their shutdown, not actually ensure it happens.
>
> Use the BRANCH_HALT_SKIP define to skip checking the halt bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists