[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJX_Q+2qZg+RuwxmnM3rzs_akt_UMJRx+=aMxf72P-sGNjm9uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:53:32 +0100
From: Lucas Tanure <tanure@...ux.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Nick <nick@...das.com>,
Artem <art@...das.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: serial: amlogic,meson-uart: Add
compatible string for T7
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 9:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 23/06/2023 10:12, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > Amlogic T7 SoCs uses the same UART controller as S4 SoCs and G12A.
> > There is no need for an extra compatible line in the driver, but
> > add T7 compatible line for documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanure@...ux.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> > index 01ec45b3b406..ad970c9ed1c7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> > @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ properties:
> > items:
> > - const: amlogic,meson-g12a-uart
> > - const: amlogic,meson-gx-uart
> > + - description: UART controller on T7 compatible SoCs
>
> Your description is rather incorrect. This is UART on SoCs compatible
> with S4, not with T7. Otherwise what do you expect to grow later when
> adding more compatible devices? Just drop the description, it's kind of
> obvious when done correctly (but can be misleading if done wrong).
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
Sorry, but S4 is already added in another way, which accepts just an
S4 compatible string.
But for T7 we need a fallback.
Could you let me know what you're asking here? Redo S4 and add T7? Or
do T7 in another different way that I didn't get?
Do you want a v6 patch series? If yes, could you be more clear about
how you want it?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists