[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJXzRzJy99d3v7FY@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:32:23 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: "Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sebastian.tobuschat@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add *_reg_field
functions
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:41:13AM +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
> Between TJA1120 and TJA1103 the hardware was improved, but some register
> addresses were changed and some bit fields were moved from one register
> to another.
>
> To integrate more PHYs in the same driver with the same register fields,
> but these register fields located in different registers at
> different offsets, I introduced the nxp_c45_reg_field structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c
> index f1f15a1b6cfc..2664b3bfcb35 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,21 @@ struct nxp_c45_skb_cb {
> unsigned int type;
> };
>
> +#define NXP_C45_REG_FIELD(_reg, _devad, _offset, _size) \
> + ((struct nxp_c45_reg_field) { \
> + .reg = _reg, \
> + .devad = _devad, \
> + .offset = _offset, \
> + .size = _size, \
> + })
> +
> +struct nxp_c45_reg_field {
> + u16 reg;
> + u8 devad;
> + u8 offset;
> + u8 size;
> +};
> +
> struct nxp_c45_hwts {
> u32 nsec;
> u32 sec;
> @@ -225,6 +240,73 @@ struct nxp_c45_phy_stats {
> u16 mask;
> };
>
> +static int nxp_c45_read_reg_field(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + const struct nxp_c45_reg_field *reg_field)
Hi Radu,
I think this is resolved in a latter patch in this series.
But nxp_c45_read_reg_field is defined but not used.
As is nxp_c45_set_reg_field and nxp_c45_clear_reg_field.
This causes an allmodconfig build to fail on x86_64 with GCC 12.3.0.
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists