linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/18] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1969749.1687511298@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:08:18 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/18] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> If we can't reach instant agreement --
> can you strategically separate out the minimal set of changes required
> to just kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST. IMHO it's worth getting that into
> 6.5.

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:

> Given all the above, and the late stage of the current devel cycle,
> would you consider slicing down this series to just kill
> MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST, as Jakub suggested?

I could do that.

There is also another alternative.  I could just push the sendpage wrappers up
the stack into the higher-level callers.  Basically this:

int udp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
		 size_t size, int flags)
{
	struct bio_vec bvec;
	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = flags | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES };

	if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
		msg.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;

	bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, size, offset);
	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
	return udp_sendmsg(sk, &msg, size);
}

and kill off sendpage and MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST.

David