[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <febf5078-2433-641d-52ec-0dea0e849c5b@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:37:56 +0530
From: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Update GCC clocks for QDU1000 and
QRU1000 SoCs
On 6/22/2023 7:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/06/2023 13:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/06/2023 12:49, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>> Update the qcom GCC clock bindings and add v2 compatible string for QDU1000
>>> and QRU1000 SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml | 6 +++++-
>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.h | 4 +++-
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml
>>> index 767a9d03aa32..030953d258c1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml
>>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller for QDU1000 and QRU1000
>>>
>>> maintainers:
>>> - Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>>> + - Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>> + - Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
>>
>> I appreciate adding more maintainers, it is welcomed and needed.
>>
>> However many of Qualcomm folks, including some of you, did not care
>> enough to fix their old/incorrect email in existing entries, thus we
>> have hundreds of wrong addresses and email bounces.
>>
>> We already raised this internally and publicly, with just small effect,
>> so I am not sure what to do more. For me, allowing to have outdated
>> email in maintainers is an easiest proof that maintainer does not care.
>> Adding more maintainer entries, while maintainer does not care, would
>> not feel right. Maybe let's start with fixing existing entries?
>
> +Cc Alex,
>
> Let me emphasize more, because I did not see any follow up patches since
> my previous email - there are many, many stale maintainer entries from
> Qualcomm. Several of them have codeaurora.org email. Some have just old
> emails of folks who left.
>
> Can we expect fixing these?
Sure, will post a separate clean up patch for fixing all the
old/incorrect maintainers email addresses from all the binding files.
Thanks,
Imran
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists