[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJV0/cbjn1Qa62u+@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:33:33 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Cc: Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...s.st.com>,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: stm32f7: Add atomic_xfer method to driver
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 03:21:59PM +0200, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> Add an atomic_xfer method to the driver so that it behaves correctly
> when controlling a PMIC that is responsible for device shutdown.
>
> The atomic_xfer method added is similar to the one from the i2c-mv64xxx
> driver. When running an atomic_xfer a bool flag in the driver data is
> set, the interrupt is not unmasked on transfer start, and the IRQ
> handler is manually invoked while waiting for pending transfers to
> complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Pierre-Yves, Alain, any further comments to this patch?
> Is it okay to keep the DMA transfer in atomic?
Will DMA actually run in atomic mode?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists