[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CTK1AI4TVYRZ.F77OZB62YYC0@otso>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:38:04 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"Avri Altman" <avri.altman@....com>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for
sdm845 by adding reg-names
On Fri Jun 23, 2023 at 2:31 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2023 13:30, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > There is a warning on dtbs check for sdm845, amongst other platforms,
> > about the reg-names being unevaluated. Fix that by adding reg-names to
> > the clocks and reg properties check for such platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: 462c5c0aa798 ("dt-bindings: ufs: qcom,ufs: convert to dtschema")
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > index 0209713d1f88..894b57117314 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > @@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ allOf:
> > reg:
> > minItems: 2
> > maxItems: 2
> > + reg-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: std
> > + - const: ice
>
> reg-names looks like a new property, so it should be defined in
> top-level and just constrained per-variant.
>
> Also there was similar approach:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com/
>
> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded.
Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to
find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with
my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten
forgotten.
With my private mailbox I just have a different folder for patches that
have been sent which I archive once they're applied, but with work GMail
I don't see how I can easily replicate this since it's also not grouping
threads properly.
Also patch 4/5 in this series has an equivalent from me:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-3-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com/
^ this might also be preferable since I guess it doesn't break
dt_binding_check?
Regards
Luca
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists