[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230623130856.GA11636@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:08:57 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@...look.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: ralink: match all supported system controller
compatible strings
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:17:48AM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> Recently, A new clock and reset controller driver has been introduced to
> the ralink mips target[1]. It provides proper system control and adds more
> SoC specific compatible strings. In order to better initialize CPUs, this
> patch removes the outdated "ralink,mt7620a-sysc" and add all dt-binding
> documented compatible strings to the system controller match table.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230619040941.1340372-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@...look.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/ralink/of.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/of.c b/arch/mips/ralink/of.c
> index 53a2ae9ee..1c6c953d5 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/of.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/of.c
> @@ -40,10 +40,15 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtmips_memc_match[] = {
>
> static const struct of_device_id mtmips_sysc_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-sysc" },
> - { .compatible = "ralink,mt7620a-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,mt7620-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,mt7628-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,mt7688-sysc" },
> { .compatible = "ralink,rt2880-sysc" },
> { .compatible = "ralink,rt3050-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,rt3052-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,rt3352-sysc" },
> { .compatible = "ralink,rt3883-sysc" },
> + { .compatible = "ralink,rt5350-sysc" },
> {}
> };
>
> --
> 2.30.2
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists