[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8265a1d-926c-f8c4-7b60-de5f55bd1b0a@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:17:30 +0530
From: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <ekangupt@....qualcomm.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bkumar@....qualcomm.com>,
<fastrpc.upstream@....qualcomm.com>, stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] misc: fastrpc: Fix remote heap allocation request
On 6/12/2023 5:34 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 05/06/2023 15:11, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>> Remote heap is used by DSP audioPD on need basis. This memory is
>> allocated from reserved CMA memory region and is then shared with
>> audioPD to use it for it's functionality.
>>
>> Current implementation of remote heap is not allocating the memory
>> from CMA region, instead it is allocating the memory from SMMU
>> context bank. The arguments passed to scm call for the reassignment
>> of ownership is also not correct. Added changes to allocate CMA
>> memory and have a proper ownership reassignment.
>>
>> Fixes: 532ad70c6d44 ("misc: fastrpc: Add mmap request assigning for
>> static PD pool")
>> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
>> Tested-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> index 30d4d04..f5fc2de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> @@ -1866,7 +1866,11 @@ static int fastrpc_req_mmap(struct fastrpc_user
>> *fl, char __user *argp)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> - err = fastrpc_buf_alloc(fl, fl->sctx->dev, req.size, &buf);
>> + if (req.flags == ADSP_MMAP_REMOTE_HEAP_ADDR)
>> + err = fastrpc_remote_heap_alloc(fl, dev, req.size, &buf);
>> + else
>> + err = fastrpc_buf_alloc(fl, dev, req.size, &buf);
>> +
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate buffer\n");
>> return err;
>> @@ -1905,12 +1909,22 @@ static int fastrpc_req_mmap(struct
>> fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp)
>> /* Add memory to static PD pool, protection thru hypervisor */
>> if (req.flags == ADSP_MMAP_REMOTE_HEAP_ADDR && fl->cctx->vmcount) {
>> - struct qcom_scm_vmperm perm;
>> + u64 src_perms = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
>> + struct qcom_scm_vmperm *dst_perms;
>> + u32 i;
>> - perm.vmid = QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS;
>> - perm.perm = QCOM_SCM_PERM_RWX;
>> - err = qcom_scm_assign_mem(buf->phys, buf->size,
>> - &fl->cctx->perms, &perm, 1);
>> + dst_perms = kcalloc(fl->cctx->vmcount,
>> + sizeof(struct qcom_scm_vmperm), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dst_perms)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + for (i = 0; i < fl->cctx->vmcount; i++) {
>> + dst_perms[i].vmid = fl->cctx->vmperms[i].vmid;
>> + dst_perms[i].perm = fl->cctx->vmperms[i].perm;
>> + }
>> +
> Why not use fl->cctx->vmperms instead of allocating a new dst_perms?
>
> --srini
>
Thanks Srini for your comments. I'll address them in next patch.
>> + err = qcom_scm_assign_mem(buf->phys,(u64)buf->size,
>> + &src_perms, dst_perms, fl->cctx->vmcount);
>> + kfree(dst_perms);
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(fl->sctx->dev, "Failed to assign memory phys
>> 0x%llx size 0x%llx err %d",
>> buf->phys, buf->size, err);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists