[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230623142936.268456-6-peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:29:33 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, peterx@...hat.com,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/8] mm/gup: Accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"
The acceleration of THP was done with ctx.page_mask, however it'll be
ignored if **pages is non-NULL.
The old optimization was introduced in 2013 in 240aadeedc4a ("mm:
accelerate mm_populate() treatment of THP pages"). It didn't explain why
we can't optimize the **pages non-NULL case. It's possible that at that
time the major goal was for mm_populate() which should be enough back then.
Optimize thp for all cases, by properly looping over each subpage, doing
cache flushes, and boost refcounts / pincounts where needed in one go.
This can be verified using gup_test below:
# chrt -f 1 ./gup_test -m 512 -t -L -n 1024 -r 10
Before: 13992.50 ( +-8.75%)
After: 378.50 (+-69.62%)
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
mm/gup.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 4a00d609033e..22e32cff9ac7 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1199,16 +1199,53 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
goto out;
}
next_page:
- if (pages) {
- pages[i] = page;
- flush_anon_page(vma, page, start);
- flush_dcache_page(page);
- ctx.page_mask = 0;
- }
-
page_increm = 1 + (~(start >> PAGE_SHIFT) & ctx.page_mask);
if (page_increm > nr_pages)
page_increm = nr_pages;
+
+ if (pages) {
+ struct page *subpage;
+ unsigned int j;
+
+ /*
+ * This must be a large folio (and doesn't need to
+ * be the whole folio; it can be part of it), do
+ * the refcount work for all the subpages too.
+ *
+ * NOTE: here the page may not be the head page
+ * e.g. when start addr is not thp-size aligned.
+ * try_grab_folio() should have taken care of tail
+ * pages.
+ */
+ if (page_increm > 1) {
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ /*
+ * Since we already hold refcount on the
+ * large folio, this should never fail.
+ */
+ folio = try_grab_folio(page, page_increm - 1,
+ foll_flags);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio)) {
+ /*
+ * Release the 1st page ref if the
+ * folio is problematic, fail hard.
+ */
+ gup_put_folio(page_folio(page), 1,
+ foll_flags);
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (j = 0; j < page_increm; j++) {
+ subpage = nth_page(page, j);
+ pages[i + j] = subpage;
+ flush_anon_page(vma, subpage, start + j * PAGE_SIZE);
+ flush_dcache_page(subpage);
+ }
+ }
+
i += page_increm;
start += page_increm * PAGE_SIZE;
nr_pages -= page_increm;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists