linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: amd: update pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZJW1zjWMUYXP1XpH@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:10:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc:     Arun Gopal Kondaveeti <arungopal.kondaveeti@....com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Vijendar.Mukunda@....com,
        Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com, sunil-kumar.dommati@....com,
        venkataprasad.potturu@....com, syed.sabakareem@....com,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: amd: update pm_runtime enable sequence

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:40:15AM -0500, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 6/23/2023 4:41 PM, Arun Gopal Kondaveeti wrote:
> > pm_runtime_allow() is not needed for ACP child platform devices.
> > Replace pm_runtime_allow() with pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()
> > & pm_runtime_set_active() in pm_runtime enable sequence for
> > ACP child platform drivers.

> Can you explain what prompted this?

> Does this fix a particular bug, or is it just to correct
> things?  If it fixes a particular bug; I think it should be
> split up across 5 patches (one for each APU) and then
> appropriate Fixes tags applied for each on the code they're
> fixing.

I had already gone ahead and applied this before your mail - it seemed
better to get it into 6.5 than leave it waiting longer.  If there's a
need for backports that can be handled through the stable process.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)