[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCiaknUMSU4CunSQrRP=WS8DAbToVo5jibh8TaWNZXGMbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:37 +0200
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] x86/resctrl: Determine if Sub-NUMA Cluster is
enabled and initialize.
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:02 PM Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I'm not getting as good of results with the new series.
> > The main difference seems to be updating the 0xca0 MSR instead of
> > applying the offset to PQR_ASSOC.
>
> I think I may have reversed the actions to update the MSR in one of
> my refactor/rebase. The comment here is correct, but that's not
> what the code is doing :-(
>
> Can you swap the bodies of these two functions and retest?
It's a small improvement, but still not great. Still only node 0
giving believable results, but at least no more empty results from the
second package.
I poked around in /proc/kcore and noticed that my snc_ways is still 1, though.
-Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists