[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230623152204.2216297-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:21:55 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...gfor.com.cn>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: fix build error with CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=n
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
It appears that a merge conflict ended up hiding a newly added constant
in some configurations:
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S:59: Error: undefined symbol FTRACE_OPS_DIRECT_CALL used as an immediate value
FTRACE_OPS_DIRECT_CALL is still used when CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
is enabled, even if CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is disabled, so change the
ifdef accordingly.
Fixes: 3646970322464 ("arm64: ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 757d01a68ffd0..5ff1942b04fcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -213,9 +213,9 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(FGRET_REGS_X7, offsetof(struct fgraph_ret_regs, regs[7]));
DEFINE(FGRET_REGS_FP, offsetof(struct fgraph_ret_regs, fp));
DEFINE(FGRET_REGS_SIZE, sizeof(struct fgraph_ret_regs));
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
DEFINE(FTRACE_OPS_DIRECT_CALL, offsetof(struct ftrace_ops, direct_call));
-#endif
#endif
return 0;
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists