[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083EA4CED8706C77622AAF2FC23A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:40:25 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/4] x86/mce: Add per-bank CMCI storm mitigation
Thanks for the review.
> Which means, since those are used by both, the confusing "cmci" should
> not be in the names.
>
> And which also means, those should be static and private to mce/core.c.
> But I'll see what functionality the rest of the patches need and how it
> all should be split/exported properly.
I'll wait for you to finish this analysis before I spin up v7 of the series.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists