linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Disable preemption for CPER decoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083662CBA9A2F40512034D0FC23A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:44:06 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Disable preemption for CPER decoding

> But I don't know about m->cpuid. Mixing processor revisions is not 
> allowed on AMD systems, and I don't know about other vendors. So I'd 
> leave m->cpuid as global unless there's a strong case otherwise.

There is (or was) support for mixed stepping in the microcode update
code. Not sure if Boris and Ashok came to any agreement on keeping it.

-Tony