[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230623085336.1a486ca3@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:53:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
vadfed@...a.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
vadfed@...com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, javierm@...hat.com,
ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, mst@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
michal.michalik@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...hat.com,
ogabbay@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nipun.gupta@....com,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk, masahiroy@...nel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, liuhangbin@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, poros@...hat.com,
mschmidt@...hat.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going
> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example:
> 1) mode_set op removal
> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok -
> that's the unfinished discussion)
> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds
> reasonable, yet nothing changed
>
> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and
> over?
FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in
refreshing the series.
But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of
outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover
letter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists