[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJUEPPSIRsOFNoWP@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:32:28 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Linux Contribution Maturity Model and the
wider community
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:51:19AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> - The roles of maintainer and reviewer should be taught in universities at
> a post-graduate level to increase the talent pool.
Umm. I can't say that I know anyone who studied computer science at a
post-graduate level and then became a Linux maintainer. They probably
exist, but I'm not aware of them. In contrast, I can name two people
who started a PhD in another subject and then got lured into Linux
development, abandoning their PhD. I suspect most have a bachelors.
Some do not have a degree.
I don't think it's the role of a computer science department to do
this kind of teaching. It feels more practical. Now maybe it's part
of a software engineering curriculum, but then I don't think it's a
post-graduate topic.
It could also be something a professional society pushes. The British
Computer Society were really into that kind of thing twenty-five years
ago when they were trying to persuade me to join.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists