linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: Add LLCC compatible for QDU1000/QRU1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b44b71d2-949f-8ae3-7369-4430e78de3ec@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:37:42 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: Add LLCC compatible
 for QDU1000/QRU1000

On 23/06/2023 16:18, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add LLCC compatible for QDU1000/QRU1000 SoCs and add optional
> nvmem-cells and nvmem-cell-names property.

Your commit should explain why you are doing this. I can easily see from
the diff that you add nvmem-cells. But why?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof