lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f643cc54-e7c6-bff5-1a54-b84024235f84@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:32:50 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on



Le 22/06/2023 à 08:31, Josh Poimboeuf a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:20:31PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Most of the time objtool warnings are useless without the
>> absolute address within the section.
>>
>> Today there is --sec-address option to get it printed, but
>> that option is nowhere used and requires a change in Makefile
>> to use it.
>>
>> Having the address inside the section at all time in addition
>> to the address within the object doesn't hurt and will help.
>>
>> Remove the --sec-address option and print it at all time.
> 
> This option actually feels like clutter to me.  The func+offset format
> works fine, combined with scripts like objdump-func and faddr2line.  And
> we also have a new OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1 option which auto-disassembles the
> affected function.
> 
> On x86 we've been using func+offset for console stack traces for many
> years, due to KASLR.  So maybe we're just more used to it.  But the
> scripts make it fine.

Ah right, I didn't know that script, I was struggling with objtool -dr

Therefore the patch is not needed, and neither is the --sec-address 
option, maybe we can remove it completely.

> 
> Also it helps with identifying the same warning across different
> configs/compilers.
> 

Good point.

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ