| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230624092330.157338-5-benno.lossin@proton.me>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:25:19 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] rust: init: add `..Zeroable::zeroed()` syntax for zeroing all missing fields
Add the struct update syntax to the init macros, but only for
`..Zeroable::zeroed()`. Adding this at the end of the struct initializer
allows one to omit fields from the initializer, these fields will be
initialized with 0x00 set to every byte. Only types that implement the
`Zeroable` trait can utilize this.
Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
---
rust/kernel/init.rs | 16 +++++-
rust/kernel/init/macros.rs | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/init.rs b/rust/kernel/init.rs
index ecf6a4bd0ce4..44bc3e77419a 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/init.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/init.rs
@@ -508,14 +508,18 @@ macro_rules! stack_try_pin_init {
/// - Fields that you want to initialize in-place have to use `<-` instead of `:`.
/// - In front of the initializer you can write `&this in` to have access to a [`NonNull<Self>`]
/// pointer named `this` inside of the initializer.
+/// - Using struct update syntax one can place `..Zeroable::zeroed()` at the very end of the
+/// struct, this initializes every field with 0 and then runs all initializers specified in the
+/// body. This can only be done if [`Zeroable`] is implemented for the struct.
///
/// For instance:
///
/// ```rust
/// # use kernel::pin_init;
-/// # use macros::pin_data;
+/// # use macros::{pin_data, Zeroable};
/// # use core::{ptr::addr_of_mut, marker::PhantomPinned};
/// #[pin_data]
+/// #[derive(Zeroable)]
/// struct Buf {
/// // `ptr` points into `buf`.
/// ptr: *mut u8,
@@ -528,6 +532,10 @@ macro_rules! stack_try_pin_init {
/// ptr: unsafe { addr_of_mut!((*this.as_ptr()).buf).cast() },
/// pin: PhantomPinned,
/// });
+/// pin_init!(Buf {
+/// buf: [1; 64],
+/// ..Zeroable::zeroed(),
+/// });
/// ```
///
/// [`try_pin_init!`]: kernel::try_pin_init
@@ -547,6 +555,7 @@ macro_rules! pin_init {
@data(PinData, use_data),
@has_data(HasPinData, __pin_data),
@construct_closure(pin_init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
};
}
@@ -603,6 +612,7 @@ macro_rules! try_pin_init {
@data(PinData, use_data),
@has_data(HasPinData, __pin_data),
@construct_closure(pin_init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
};
($(&$this:ident in)? $t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),* $(,)?>)? {
@@ -616,6 +626,7 @@ macro_rules! try_pin_init {
@data(PinData, use_data),
@has_data(HasPinData, __pin_data),
@construct_closure(pin_init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
};
}
@@ -650,6 +661,7 @@ macro_rules! init {
@data(InitData, /*no use_data*/),
@has_data(HasInitData, __init_data),
@construct_closure(init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
}
}
@@ -700,6 +712,7 @@ macro_rules! try_init {
@data(InitData, /*no use_data*/),
@has_data(HasInitData, __init_data),
@construct_closure(init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
};
($(&$this:ident in)? $t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),* $(,)?>)? {
@@ -713,6 +726,7 @@ macro_rules! try_init {
@data(InitData, /*no use_data*/),
@has_data(HasInitData, __init_data),
@construct_closure(init_from_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($fields)*),
)
};
}
diff --git a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
index 1e0c4aca055a..5dcb2e513f26 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
@@ -989,6 +989,7 @@ impl<$($impl_generics)*> $pin_data<$($ty_generics)*>
///
/// This macro has multiple internal call configurations, these are always the very first ident:
/// - nothing: this is the base case and called by the `{try_}{pin_}init!` macros.
+/// - `with_update_parsed`: when the `..Zeroable::zeroed()` syntax has been handled.
/// - `init_slot`: recursively creates the code that initializes all fields in `slot`.
/// - `make_initializer`: recursively create the struct initializer that guarantees that every
/// field has been initialized exactly once.
@@ -1007,6 +1008,82 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
@has_data($has_data:ident, $get_data:ident),
// `pin_init_from_closure` or `init_from_closure`.
@construct_closure($construct_closure:ident),
+ @munch_fields(),
+ ) => {
+ $crate::__init_internal!(with_update_parsed:
+ @this($($this)?),
+ @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
+ @fields($($fields)*),
+ @error($err),
+ @data($data, $($use_data)?),
+ @has_data($has_data, $get_data),
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure),
+ @zeroed(), // nothing means default behavior.
+ )
+ };
+ (
+ @this($($this:ident)?),
+ @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
+ @fields($($fields:tt)*),
+ @error($err:ty),
+ // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
+ // case.
+ @data($data:ident, $($use_data:ident)?),
+ // `HasPinData` or `HasInitData`.
+ @has_data($has_data:ident, $get_data:ident),
+ // `pin_init_from_closure` or `init_from_closure`.
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure:ident),
+ @munch_fields(..Zeroable::zeroed()),
+ ) => {
+ $crate::__init_internal!(with_update_parsed:
+ @this($($this)?),
+ @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
+ @fields($($fields)*),
+ @error($err),
+ @data($data, $($use_data)?),
+ @has_data($has_data, $get_data),
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure),
+ @zeroed(()), // `()` means zero all fields not mentioned.
+ )
+ };
+ (
+ @this($($this:ident)?),
+ @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
+ @fields($($fields:tt)*),
+ @error($err:ty),
+ // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
+ // case.
+ @data($data:ident, $($use_data:ident)?),
+ // `HasPinData` or `HasInitData`.
+ @has_data($has_data:ident, $get_data:ident),
+ // `pin_init_from_closure` or `init_from_closure`.
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure:ident),
+ @munch_fields($ignore:tt $($rest:tt)*),
+ ) => {
+ $crate::__init_internal!(
+ @this($($this)?),
+ @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
+ @fields($($fields)*),
+ @error($err),
+ @data($data, $($use_data)?),
+ @has_data($has_data, $get_data),
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure),
+ @munch_fields($($rest)*),
+ )
+ };
+ (with_update_parsed:
+ @this($($this:ident)?),
+ @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
+ @fields($($fields:tt)*),
+ @error($err:ty),
+ // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
+ // case.
+ @data($data:ident, $($use_data:ident)?),
+ // `HasPinData` or `HasInitData`.
+ @has_data($has_data:ident, $get_data:ident),
+ // `pin_init_from_closure` or `init_from_closure`.
+ @construct_closure($construct_closure:ident),
+ @zeroed($($init_zeroed:expr)?),
) => {{
// We do not want to allow arbitrary returns, so we declare this type as the `Ok` return
// type and shadow it later when we insert the arbitrary user code. That way there will be
@@ -1024,6 +1101,17 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
{
// Shadow the structure so it cannot be used to return early.
struct __InitOk;
+ // If `$init_zeroed` is present we should zero the slot now and not emit an
+ // error when fields are missing (since they will be zeroed). We also have to
+ // check that the type actually implements `Zeroable`.
+ $(
+ fn is_zeroable<T: Zeroable>(ptr: *mut T) {}
+ // Ensure that the struct is indeed `Zeroable`.
+ is_zeroable(slot);
+ // SAFETY: The type implements `Zeroable` by the check above.
+ unsafe { ::core::ptr::write_bytes(slot, 0, 1) };
+ $init_zeroed // this will be `()` if set.
+ )?
// Create the `this` so it can be referenced by the user inside of the
// expressions creating the individual fields.
$(let $this = unsafe { ::core::ptr::NonNull::new_unchecked(slot) };)?
@@ -1064,7 +1152,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
@data($data:ident),
@slot($slot:ident),
@guards($($guards:ident,)*),
- @munch_fields($(,)?),
+ @munch_fields($(..Zeroable::zeroed())? $(,)?),
) => {
// Endpoint of munching, no fields are left. If execution reaches this point, all fields
// have been initialized. Therefore we can now dismiss the guards by forgetting them.
@@ -1157,6 +1245,30 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
@munch_fields($($rest)*),
);
};
+ (make_initializer:
+ @slot($slot:ident),
+ @type_name($t:ident),
+ @munch_fields(..Zeroable::zeroed() $(,)?),
+ @acc($($acc:tt)*),
+ ) => {
+ // Endpoint, nothing more to munch, create the initializer. Since the users specified
+ // `..Zeroable::zeroed()`, the slot will already have been zeroed and all field that have
+ // not been overwritten are thus zero and initialized. We still check that all fields are
+ // actually accessible by using the struct update syntax ourselves.
+ // Since we are in the `if false` branch, this will never get executed. We abuse `slot` to
+ // get the correct type inference here:
+ unsafe {
+ let mut zeroed = ::core::mem::zeroed();
+ // We have to use type inference her to make zeroed have the correct type. This does
+ // not get executed, so it has no effect.
+ ::core::ptr::write($slot, zeroed);
+ zeroed = ::core::mem::zeroed();
+ ::core::ptr::write($slot, $t {
+ $($acc)*
+ ..zeroed
+ });
+ }
+ };
(make_initializer:
@slot($slot:ident),
@type_name($t:ident),
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists