[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b40b16e-025a-c10b-e99b-404246de73fe@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 16:48:41 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: msm: dsi-phy-14nm: Document SM6125
variant
On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
> index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm
> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290
> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660
> + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125
Should we start using standard scheme, so "qcom,sm6125-dsi-phy-14nm" ?
> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists