[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJcQA4baHKWgo9zV@corigine.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:47:15 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/26] gve: use array_size
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:14:35PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Use array_size to protect against multiplication overflows.
>
> The changes were done using the following Coccinelle semantic patch:
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> size_t e1,e2;
> expression COUNT;
> identifier alloc = {vmalloc,vzalloc,kvmalloc,kvzalloc};
> @@
>
> (
> alloc(
> - (e1) * (e2)
> + array_size(e1, e2)
> ,...)
> |
> alloc(
> - (e1) * (COUNT)
> + array_size(COUNT, e1)
> ,...)
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists