[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJY0Nudy8ym2kKNg@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:09:26 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
erdemaktas@...gle.com, Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>, chen.bo@...el.com,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: guest memory: Misc enhacnement
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> * VM type: Now we have KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM. How do we proceed?
> - Keep KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for its use. Introduce KVM_X86_TDX_VM
> - Use KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for TDX. (If necessary, introduce another type in
> the future)
How would KVM differentiate between software-protected VMs and TDX VMs if we go
with this option?
> - any other way?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists