[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ec4c1c7-11cf-6518-933d-cb9167ab3bd0@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 16:55:58 +0800
From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] perf metric: Event "Compat" value supports
matching multiple identifiers
在 2023/6/24 上午7:52, Namhyung Kim 写道:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:42 PM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/6/6 上午3:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道:
>>> Em Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 10:46:36AM +0800, Jing Zhang escreveu:
>>>> 在 2023/6/3 上午12:20, John Garry 写道:
>>>>> On 01/06/2023 09:58, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> It can match identifiers "arm_cmn600_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_cmn650_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_cmn700_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_ci700_{ 0,1,2..X}".
>>>>>> In other words, it can match all identifiers prefixed with “arm_cmn600” or “arm_cmn650” or “arm_cmn700” or “arm_ci700”.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a new model arm_cmn driver with identifier "arm_cmn750_0", it will not be matched, but if a new revision arm_cmn driver with identifier
>>>>>> "arm_cmn700_4", it can be matched.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I see what you mean. My confusion came about though your commit message on this same patch, which did not mention cmn650. I assumed that the example event which you were describing was supported for arm_cmn650 and you intentionally omitted it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I didn't write cmn650 in the commit message, just because I omitted it. I will add it in a later version.
>>>
>>> Ok, will wait for v4 then.
>>>
>>> - Arnaldo
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> Thank you for following up this patchset, maybe we can merge patch4 to patch7 into your branch first?
>> They have all been reviewed/acked and there is no dispute. And patch4-7 does not depend on patch1-3,
>> because patch4-7 is about the metric of ali_drw_pmu, and patch1-3 is about the metric of arm_cmn.
>> It may take some time for patch1-3 to reach a consensus.
>
> IIUC patch 4 is for the kernel and patch 5-7 semantically depend on it.
> So the patch 4 should be picked up by the kernel maintainers first.
>
Yes, that's right, thanks.
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists