[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230625123514.4069724-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:35:14 +0800
From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, daniel.baluta@....com,
iuliana.prodan@....com
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: iterate all notifiyids in rx callback
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
The current code has an assumption that there is one tx and one rx
vring, but it is not always true. There maybe more vrings. So iterate
all notifyids to not miss any vring events.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index f9874fc5a80f..e3f40d0e9f3d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -725,13 +725,23 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
return 0;
}
+static int imx_rproc_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
+{
+ struct rproc *rproc = data;
+
+ if (rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id) == IRQ_NONE)
+ dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "no message in vqid: %d\n", id);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void imx_rproc_vq_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(work, struct imx_rproc,
rproc_work);
+ struct rproc *rproc = priv->rproc;
- rproc_vq_interrupt(priv->rproc, 0);
- rproc_vq_interrupt(priv->rproc, 1);
+ idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, imx_rproc_notified_idr_cb, rproc);
}
static void imx_rproc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg)
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists