[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11b893e.86425ef4.188f33688b8@tnonline.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 17:40:17 +0200 (GMT+02:00)
From: Forza <forza@...nline.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, a1bert@...as.cz,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: do not output a spurious warning when huge
vmalloc() fails
---- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> -- Sent: 2023-06-07 - 18:33 ----
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:58:40 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
>> I would really suggest moving the fix to
>> mm-hotfixes instead of mm-unstable, and
>>
>> Fixes: 80b1d8fdfad1 ("mm: vmalloc: correct use of __GFP_NOWARN mask in __vmalloc_area_node()")
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>
> I've made those changes.
Did the chabge go into 6.3 stable? I saw these issues with kernels 6.3.0-6 3.7. I now updated to 6.3.9 and have had no more warnings since.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists