[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEm4hYUhRCBo=N9EKUaSbBWZafKk0WzzwDWYmJ4FykpQoeZe1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 11:14:59 +0800
From: Xinghui Li <korantwork@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
Cc: dlemoal@...nel.org, helgaas@...nel.org,
nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com, kbusch@...nel.org,
jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xinghui Li <korantli@...cent.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: vmd: Fix two issues in VMD reported by Smatch
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:33 AM Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> [1/1] PCI: vmd: Fix uninitialized variable usage in vmd_enable_domain()
> https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/0c0206dc4f5b
>
> > PCI: vmd: Clean up one inconsistent indenting warn reported by Smatch
>
> Even though this is a very nice clean-up, I did not take this patch at this
> time, as there has been a similar patch posted in the past, and Christoph
> Hellwig suggested, as part of his review, an alternative approach worth
> considering.
>
> Have a look at the following and let me know what you think:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20221115054847.77829-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com/
I think Christoph Hellwig's suggestion is indeed better.
So, should I submit a new patch to address this issue?
Thanks~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists