linux-kernel - [PATCH] staging: nvec: udelay to usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 25 Jun 2023 14:55:35 -0400
From:   Uros Milojkovic <uroshm@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marvin24@....de,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] staging: nvec: udelay to usleep_range

Checkpatch pl alerts that usleep_range is preferred to udelay. The
change is made.
Signed-off-by: umilojkovic <uroshm@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
index 2823cacde130..8bb3b691d1f5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
         break;
     case 2:        /* first byte after command */
         if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
-            udelay(33);
+            usleep_range(33, 200);
             if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) {
                 dev_err(nvec->dev,
                     "Read without prior read command\n");
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
      * We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without
      * it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated.
      */
-    udelay(100);
+    usleep_range(100, 200);

     return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
2.34.1