linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] libceph: Partially revert changes to support MSG_SPLICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOi1vP-q8Yx6fntSnM+Zf77nQBryvm1+++cyg-NQvvVOa5eEDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:46:21 +0200
From:   Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] libceph: Partially revert changes to support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:18 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch appears to be mangled.
>
> Mangled?  Did you see tab -> space conversion?  I see that in your reply, but
> in the copy I got it's fine.

It turns out that it applies fine with "git am" but "git apply --check"
complains as follows:

error: patch fragment without header at line 203: @@ -450,10 +482,6 @@
static int write_partial_message_data(struct ceph_con=

I think it's due to the quoted-printable encoding.  I didn't have any
issues with your previous patches using the same automation so I just
assumed the patch to be mangled in the usual way.

Sorry for the noise, now that I can see the cumulative diff, I will
review shortly.

Thanks,

                Ilya