[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29f9a86d-8ee7-5e54-2979-c5fd3b6fbe2d@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:24:45 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] selftests/mm: Add -a to run_vmtests.sh
On 6/26/23 09:24, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:10:26AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 23.06.23 16:29, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> Allows to specify optional tests in run_vmtests.sh, where we can run time
>>> consuming test matrix only when user specified "-a".
>>
>> I'd have used something like "-e: extended tests that might be more
>> time-consuming".
>
> '-a' stands for "all" here, I worry '-e' may be misread into running "extra
> tests only".
>
It's getting to the point where long options would help. This one
could be "--stress-tests" or "--all", or "--include-long-running",
for example.
I hesitate to suggest it because it's extra work, but at some point
it would be nice. The options are already hopelessly un-guessable.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists