[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230626210604.GLZJn9vA3gcMAuy/eP@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 23:06:04 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sebastian Sumpf <Sebastian.Sumpf@...ode-labs.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug report] __arch_hweight32/64 x86
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:49:44PM +0200, Sebastian Sumpf wrote:
> The 'ALTERNATIVE' macro checks for the popcnt feature. In case this fails
> the '__sw_hweight' C-function is called from inline assembly with rax and
> rdi as intput/output operands. However, the code does not contain a clobber
> list of any callee safe registers that might be touched by the
> '__sw_height64' C-function.
Which registers are those? Can you be more specific?
> Therefore, these registers will not be restored
> upon function return by the compiler. This leads to varying
> exceptions/bad behavior caused by the thus corrupted registers later
> on.
How do I reproduce what you're observing so that I can take a look?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists