[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFn7+W=ZGNcSLL6p383SbA8=wstutJ85+qvXzt2G66Seg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:42:56 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: 运辉崔 <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
Cc: ron minnich <rminnich@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, yc.hung@...iatek.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
tinghan.shen@...iatek.com,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
葛士建 <geshijian@...edance.com>,
韦东 <weidong.wd@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] firmware: added a firmware information
passing method FFI
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 at 04:35, 运辉崔 <cuiyunhui@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ron, Ard,
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 11:57 PM ron minnich <rminnich@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Ard, thanks for the discussion, sounds like we are able to move forward now!
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023, 6:13 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> If this is only used on RISC-V, and implemented under arch/riscv, I
> >> have no objections.
>
> Thank you for your suggestions that made us reach an agreement, let's
> continue to review this patch.
>
> The current logic is to implement the common interface under
> drivers/firmware/, if we need this function, we can call
> fdt_fwtbl_init() to complete it in arch/xxx/kernel/setup.c.
>
> For enabling on RISC-V, we can complete it in a subsequent patch to
> setup_arch-->fdt_fwtbl_init() in arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c.
>
> What do you think?
>
I think all of this belongs under arch/riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists